Peer Review Processess

Peer Review Process

The peer review process is fundamental to maintaining the quality, credibility, and integrity of research published in the journal.

1. Submission

Manuscripts are submitted electronically via the journal’s online system and assigned to the Editor-in-Chief or an Associate Editor.

2. Initial Assessment

The editor evaluates the manuscript’s scope, originality, and overall quality. Manuscripts that do not meet journal standards may be desk-rejected.

3. Reviewer Assignment

Eligible manuscripts are reviewed by at least two independent experts with no conflicts of interest.

4. Review Process

Reviewers assess manuscripts within 3–4 weeks, focusing on:

• Originality and significance

• Methodological rigor

• Clarity and coherence

• Reference quality

• Contribution to the field

5. Editorial Decision

Based on reviewer recommendations, the editor may decide:

• Accept

• Minor revisions

• Major revisions

• Reject

6. Revision and Final Decision

Revisions must be submitted within 4–6 weeks. Final acceptance is determined by the editor, with or without further review.

7. Production and Publication

Accepted manuscripts undergo copyediting, typesetting, and proofreading before being published online with immediate open access.

Confidentiality and Ethics

All submissions and reviews are handled confidentially. The journal applies a double-blind review system, ensuring impartial and unbiased evaluation.

---

Open Access Policy

The Journal of Social Innovation and Business provides immediate and unrestricted open access to all published content.

Key Principles

• No subscription or access fees

• Immediate availability upon publication

• CC BY 4.0 licensing

• No embargo period

• Long-term digital archiving

• Compliance with major open-access mandates

This policy ensures broad dissemination, increased citation potential, and global knowledge exchange.